Sowore’s Rhetoric: Loud, Distorted, and Habitually Insensitive on National Security
CSGG NewsMedia ,
Sunday 18th January ,2026
Sowore has a diarrhoea of the mouth and displays deep insensitivity. He deliberately misrepresents the issue, pretending that serious national security discussions are about scamming people. This distortion is not accidental; it is a pattern.
We are already familiar with his advocacy strategy, which largely revolves around soliciting funds from international donors, sustained by sensationalism rather than practical solutions to Nigeria’s security challenges.
In contrast, General Christopher Gwabin Musa (rtd), Nigeria’s Defence Minister, is advanced in intelligence, disciplined in thought, and deeply committed to genuine nation-building. His views on border management reflect modern, layered security thinking, not outdated ideology.
Contrary to Sowore’s claims, border fencing has not become obsolete in today’s world. Several advanced and developing countries deploy physical border infrastructure as part of integrated security systems to manage immigration and control the inflow of criminal and violent elements. Examples include:
The United States, which maintains extensive border barriers along its southern border to curb illegal crossings and transnational crime.
India, which operates one of the world’s longest border fences along Bangladesh to control illegal migration and smuggling.
Israel, whose security barrier has significantly reduced terrorist infiltration.
Saudi Arabia, which has fortified borders with Iraq and Yemen to prevent militant infiltration.
Hungary and Greece, which erected border fences to manage irregular migration into the European Union.
Spain, which maintains fortified fences around Ceuta and Melilla to regulate cross-border movement.
These countries understand a basic truth: technology, intelligence, diplomacy, and physical infrastructure work together, not in isolation. No serious nation abandons border control under the excuse of ideology or donor-friendly rhetoric.
As a public response, the Citizens Support for Good Governance (CSGG) views Sowore’s position as aligning dangerously with the narratives promoted by conflict entrepreneurs and international circles that benefit from weak states, porous borders, and national disintegration.
Whether by intent or convenience, such rhetoric undermines national cohesion and emboldens non-state actors who thrive on insecurity.
History, technology, and reality have indeed moved on and they demand structured security solutions, not noise, insults, or ideological grandstanding.
CG Musa represents strategy, responsibility, and national duty.
Sowore represents provocation without solutions.
